Header image

Great American Insurance claims fire death were result of “pollution”

Posted by Todd Hendrickson in Recent Litigation

The Houston Chronicle reported today that three deaths from smoke inhalation as a result of a 2007 Houstan office fire were the result of “pollution,” as in smoke inhalation. The very idea of this is ludicrous in the extreme. The insurance company is trying to get out of paying for the losses suffered by three families due to their family members deaths. Fires cause smoke, smoke contains pollutants, to be sure. But to say that death caused by smoke inhalations is a result of pollution is simply beyond belief. Keep this in mind next time you hear a story about a crazy lawyer suing for a million dollars for a lost pair of pants. For every “missing pants” case, there are literally thousands where insurance companies have adopted these tortured readings of their own policies in an attempt to avoid their responsibilities.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *